Recent Article
Here is a short article I just wrote for a Moody Northwest newspaper that my English class will be producing (probably bi-weekly) this semester (of which I am assistant editor):
Saving Faith: a Gracious Gift from God
J. K. Walters
Though we surely all agree that salvation is wholly a gift from God, and is not something that we ourselves produce or effect, some may think that the faith by which we are justified is something that a man himself must produce. They might maintain that a man’s belief in Christ is his own choice and not a thing given by God. This position, I think, is not based on Scripture. In fact, I think that the Scriptures teach just the opposite, namely, that even the faith by which we are justified is a gracious gift from God. I will now attempt to demonstrate that this is the position of the Scriptures.
Philippians 1.29 – “For it has been granted to you that for the sake of Christ you should not only believe in him but also suffer for his sake …” In this verse, it is stated that believing in Christ is not the only thing God has granted to the Philippians, but also that they may suffer for Christ’s sake. This clearly shows that believing in Christ is a thing granted by God and not a human accomplishment about which one may boast.
Ephesians 2.8-9 has also sometimes been used to support the fact that faith is a gift from God (e.g., Westminster Confession of Faith, Scripture proof version, chapter 11, section 1), but this is perhaps untenable on grammatical grounds (cf. Robertson’s Word Pictures on the passage)
In conclusion, I suggest that, rather than being seen as a negative thing (in that is would seem to absolutely minimize the role of man in his salvation), the fact that even our faith in Christ is a gift from God should be viewed as a blessing, since we know, therefore, that it is not based on our own weak selves, but upon the unshakable Rock.

7 Comments:
Well done, sir. Between you and Luther I am well pressed to even collect my thoughts, much less to argue with you.
The crown of laurels is submitted.
(Note: Eph. has NO grounds. (as opposed to just "possibly not") You, as a gramatical analyist, I thought would be able to back this readily!!)
I am hardly fit to be compared to Luther, but am pleased if you are convinced, which it seems you are.
I do not seek a perishable crown, but an imperishable.
I claim no extraordinary skills in grammatical analysis. However, a survey of the literature will reveal that there are strong arguments on both sides by competent scholars. Therefore I am hesitant to dogmatically deny the validity of either side without first studying the matter in more depth.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
My answer was an allusion to 1 Cor. 9.25. You will find frequent contrasting of the perishable with the imperishable in 1 Cor. 15, and also a reference to that contrast in 1 Pet. 1.
I guessed that.
It was well answered.
Good, you edited out the confusing stuff! ;)
Check again: I left some of your comments.
Sorry.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home